claimberry. Local workbench
SYNTHETIC DEMOInvented pets. Information readiness only. No coverage, payment or eligibility decisions.

A FIXED SET. AN OPEN NOTEBOOK.

Show your work.

Every label, every abstention, every source reference.
A reproducible snapshot of the deterministic baseline.

FIXED SET
36
synthetic cases
Fixtures synthetic/1.0.0Classifier rules/1.0.0Evaluation evaluation/1.0.0
This report describes an invented set, not real-world performance. Human reviews do not change the baseline or expected labels.

Overall accuracy

100.0%36 / 36

Exact label matches across all fixed cases, including abstentions.

Abstention rate

25.0%9 / 36

Cases where the baseline asks for human clarification.

Ambiguity precision

100.0%9 / 9

Abstentions that belong to ambiguity-expected cases.

Unsupported statements

0.0%0 / 85

Reasons without valid source fields, across all factual reasons.

CATEGORY BY CATEGORY

Accuracy & confusion counts

36 frozen cases

Per-category accuracy counts correct non-abstained proposals over expected-category support. Expected abstentions therefore show 0% here, while matching abstentions count toward overall accuracy.

Rows are expected labels; prediction columns show raw counts.
Expected categoryAccuracySupportReady for reviewNeeds evidenceOut of scopeAbstain
Ready for review100.0%9 / 999000
Needs evidence100.0%9 / 990900
Out of scope100.0%9 / 990090
Abstain0.0%0 / 990009

WHERE LABELS DIFFER

Disagreements 0

All fixed labels match.

36 of 36 expected labels match, including 9 abstentions. These fixtures exercise the documented rules; they do not establish generalization.

Differences are ordered by expected category, rule version, then case ID.

REPRODUCIBLE BY DESIGN

The fixture notebook

Entirely invented records
64
Ambiguity-expected records
16
Fixed / exploratory records
36 / 28
Generator seed
23092026
Schema
claims/1.0.0

Frozen IDs and expected labels live in data/evaluation.v1.json. Changes require a recorded version. Zero denominators display N/A.

Inspect all 36 frozen cases
Synthetic caseExpectedProposedAmbiguity expectedResult
CB-0001Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0003Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0005Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0007Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0009Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0011Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0013Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0015Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0016Ready for reviewReady for reviewNoMatch
CB-0017Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0019Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0021Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0023Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0025Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0027Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0029Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0031Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0032Needs evidenceNeeds evidenceNoMatch
CB-0033Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0035Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0037Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0039Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0041Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0043Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0045Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0047Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0048Out of scopeOut of scopeNoMatch
CB-0049AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0051AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0053AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0055AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0057AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0059AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0061AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0063AbstainAbstainYesMatch
CB-0064AbstainAbstainYesMatch